Two questions about historical decisions.
Stock Picking assesses whether inferred funded-security decisions improved subsequent returns, including the cash used or released. Downside Protection assesses whether inferred decisions reduced subsequent peak-to-trough losses.
Understand the neutral point.
The score is 100 × favourable effects ÷ total absolute effects. At 50, measured benefits equal measured harms. Above 50, benefits outweigh harms in the measured sample. The score is not a probability, win rate, peer ranking or regulatory risk rating.
Read the method before the number.
Published examples use a five-year history and three-month outcomes. Inferred decisions depend on monthly holdings, tests overlap, trading costs are not deducted and futures effects use a PSI proxy. These are experimental historical assessments, not forecasts.
Read the full score methodology.
Sources and coverage
Source: the existing Fundraxis public snapshot, collected on 27 Oct 2026. This local website uses the published test-data sample; it has not been validated as a production release. Source facts, reporting dates, coverage and analytical outputs should be assessed together.
